|
|
|
The
Assessment Package
From the Introduction to the Assessment Package
Multiple-Choice Questions and Essay Questions
Multiple-choice tests have come under attack because most of them are limited
to pure recall of vocabulary. All too often they contain no explicit question;
all the students are required to do is to fill blank space. Such "questions"
provide no information on the students' thinking. However, multiple-choice
questions can test for understanding and the ability to apply knowledge
to new situations if they are constructed properly.
Good multiple-choice questions are bona-fide questions that do not
require looking at the choices to find the answer. Students should approach
each question as if it were an essay question, first composing an answer
and only afterward looking for their answer among the choices. When the
presented choices reflect common errors or misconceptions, then even wrong
answers have a concrete diagnostic value.
Multiple-choice questions take less time to answer and less time to grade
than essay questions. Therefore, more material can be covered in a given
time. These are their strengths; Their weaknesses are that they give only
indirect information about students' thinking processes, and they provide
no outlet for creativity.
In the Sixth Edition the first weakness has been significantly ameliorated
by paying even greater attention than before to the quality of the questions.
To address the second weakness, we have included two essay questions in
each of the chapter tests.
If you wish to see further expressions of your students' thought processes,
the IPS testing package for the Sixth Edition gives you a number of options.
First, you can request that each student write a rationale for his
or her choice for one or two questions. Second, you can convert selected
multiple-choice questions into essay questions simply by covering the choices
before you reproduce the test for class use. If you do that, be sure to
announce beforehand that these questions should be answered in detail, with
all the work shown in a sequence of complete sentences.
We recommend that the tests be given as open book and open notebook tests.
The positive effect of open-notebook tests on students' study habits has
been widely demonstrated. Any students who think that with open notebooks
and open books they will not have to study regularly will recognize their
mistake after the very first test. The notebooks themselves become part
of the assessment.
The A Series and the C Series
The IPS course was designed for and is being used by a broad spectrum
of students. The relative emphasis on the development of generalizations
and concrete experiences varies from class to class. In some classes more
emphasis is placed on developing students' ability to generalize from their
experience in the classroom; in other classes the learning is directed more
to the concrete.
The A Series is more in tune with the first emphasis; the C Series, with
the second. As these are subtle distinctions, it should not be surprising
that some questions are common to both sets of tests. Nevertheless, the
C Series is considered to be easier.
The Lab Tests
Many of the questions on the Chapter Tests relate to experiments; however,
no pencil-and-paper test can take the place of an authentic hands-on test.
In fact, you may find that the students who do well on the lab tests are
not necessarily the same ones who do well on the Chapter Tests. Like the
Chapter Tests, the Lab Tests can help you judge the effectiveness of your
teaching.
When you distribute the Lab Tests, tell your class what resources will be
available to them. In addition to the standard IPS equipment and materials,
students should be allowed to use their textbooks and notebooks. The investigations
better reflect the practices of the real world if references are available
and the emphasis is shifted from memory work to practical and reasoning
skills.
Inform your students that their work will be evaluated on the basis of the
skills they show in the laboratory and the reasoning they apply to the investigation.
Make it clear that the evidence they offer to support their conclusions
is far more significant than any lucky guess. |